Alternative tool name:

Tool variation:

Category: Info/communications

Sub-category: Info

Relevant theories: Public goods, Optimization, Impact, Warm glow - sophisticated, Dual systems (system 2)

Type of evidence: Field-exp-charity

Evidence strength: 5

Main findings

Getting people to consider donation effectiveness has little/weak impact on giving. Karlan and Wood (2017): adding scientific impact info (including some quantitative information; and removing emotional stimulus in part) had a small/insignificant net effect: increased gifts from large prior donors, reduced gifts from small prior donors. Other work (Small et al, '07, study 3) find that info decreases giving (to an identified victim)… by decreasing emotional response: (study 4): priming analytic thinking (vs feeling-based) reduced giving to identifiable victims. (Perhaps attenuated by a commitment: Bergh, preliminary).

Discussion



Practical relevance

Effective charities could present their (e.g., lifesaving) statistics *relative* to average/popular charities (but be careful about demonizing particular ones)

Use cases



Prevalence:



Key papers

Secondary papers

Contributors David Reinstein

Enter your comment. Wiki syntax is allowed:
J N᠎ A Z T
 
  • tools/present_charity_effectiveness_information_and_deliberation.txt
  • Last modified: 2018/04/17 16:40
  • by katja