Avoiding Overhead Aversion In Charity
Gneezy, U.; Keenan, E. A.; Gneezy, A., (2014). Avoiding Overhead Aversion In Charity. Science, 346, 6209, 632–635.
Keywords:
Discipline:
Type of evidence: Field-exp-charity
Related tools: Pre-cover overhead costs
Related theories:
Related critiques:
Charity target: USA - Children, Health - Poor countries
Donor population:
Paper summary
++++Gneezy, Uri, Elizabeth A. Keenan, and Ayelet Gneezy. ““Avoiding overhead aversion in charity.”” Science 346.6209 (2014): 632-635.|
- ““we test whether designating early large gifts to cover overhead costs increases donors’ willingness to contribute to a charity””
- It ““should not matter””
- People might see it as a sign of efficiency and honesty, or it might give them a greater feeling of impact
Lab experiment: two charities: (i) Kids Korps USA, and (ii) charity: water;
- each participant could choose which got $100 if their decision was randomly chosen
- They varied how much of the $100 went to the charity, and whether this 'overhead' was covered by a third party
DR: Does their lab experiment depict the relevant sort of 'overhead aversion'?
Field experiment, education charity, request letter to 40,000 US households, wants to fund as many $20k projects as possible (in USA). Asked to give $ 20/50/100
- SEED: ““A private donor who believes in the importance of the project has given this campaign seed money in the amount of $10,000.””
- MATCH: “”… The matching grant will match every dollar given by donors like you with a dollar, up to a total of $20,000
- OVERHEAD: “” … $10,000 to cover all the overhead costs associated with raising the needed donations…“”
Results
- Share donating: Overhead (8.5%) > *** Seed >= Match > Control (3.4%)
- Amount raised: Overhead ($2.31) > ** Seed, Match > *** Control ($0.80)
“
Discussion
Evaluation
Study year:
Data link:
Peer reviewed:
Journal rating:
Citations: 36
Replications:
Replication success:
Pre-registered:
Verified:
Participants aware:
Demographics:
Design:
Simple comparison:
Sample size:
Share treated:
Key components:
Main treatment:
Mean donation:
SD donation:
Endowment amount:
Endowment description:
Currency:
Conversion rate:
Effect size original:
Effect size USD:
SE effect size:
SE calculation:
Effect size share:
Mean incidence:
Effect size incidence:
Headline p-val:
P-val description:
This paper has been added by David Reinstein
Discussion